pastersoho.blogg.se - Normal wbc slightly low hematocrit and hemoglobin

Normal wbc slightly low hematocrit and hemoglobin password#

By not allowing users to use the same password they've previously used, you are effectively forcing the user to change In today's era of multiple mobile devices, it is very likely that a user's password to a certain service is stored on multiple places.Could happen! It's not up to admins to impose their own mindset onto users! Who knows, in some kind of twisted logic, that actually makes sense! "Nah, nobody's dumb enough to put their own username as their Words like their first name it will make their account less secure, and they have made a conscious decision to USE that word. They want their password to be "password" or "abc123", SO BE IT! Let them! I've said this earlier - It is NOT the service provider's responsibility to insure users against their own stupidity! They know what the risks are, they know if they use easily guessable People go back to the password they're familiar with because it's what they WANT to use! It's what they remember!! A password is to identify a person! If that's how they want to be identified, what gives ANYONE else the right to tell them otherwise? If.Number of Previously Used Passwords prevention - Why are we stopping people from using their previously used passwords? Actually, why would people WANT to use their previous passwords in the first place?.but which is it? Oops I've only got 5 guesses, I've locked out my own account Name, except it isn't. now lets see, it is probably somewhere between Fluffy12 and Fluff圓7. A password is a secret that the user remembers, and it should not be an arbitrarily forced mutation of that secret. But once in a while, when we travel or get issued with a new computer, all hell breaks loose. We don't always have to manually login because we tick the "Remember It makes FAR more sense to allow the user to nominate their own password, and stick to it! Even if it is months, or even years old! Let's face it, we all have online services everywhere.Now when you have a number of services with such a theme of password, and given 3 attempts to "guess" what number you're up to, the legitimate user is essentially dictionary-attacking their own More often than not, users simply append a digit to the end of their usual password to suit such a policy. Periods, or simply have different expiry dates due to the fact they were signed up at different times.

They should not have to maintain a massive list of cryptic passwords just because different providers have different expiry A user is meant to remember, instinctively, what the password for a particular service is.

A password is meant to be easy to remember.

Let's assume for a minute that users are actually not the mindless idiots we assume them to be, and that they, can ACTUALLY understand theįact that they should NOT be handing out their passwords to everyone who asks for it.

Firstly, lets assume that it is not the service provider's responsibility to insure against the user's stupidity.

But again, what does it really achieve in an online security world?

Password Expiry policies - Why do we have this? I suspect for the same reason why Credit Cards have an expiry date on them.

Like that is: Why do you have a JOB? And HOW do you even justify a salary and sleep at night?

Forcing people to have a complex password is a bit like saying "we the service provider is too lazy to implement safeguards against dictionary attacks, so we'd rather make your life more difficult to make ours easier.".

Which reverts to the above point to protect us! and all dictionary attackers knows this anyway, therefore many of these permutations are already built into theĪttack script, defeating the purpose of "complex" passwords in the first place. seriously this is NOT really hard to guess at all, and we all do it!. eg: password turns JUST to fit in with the policy.

Even with "complex" passwords, it is human nature to simply replaces the "a"s with and "I"'s with 1 or ! in what is otherwise a perfectly legitimate alphabet-based word.

We have existing mechanisms to prevent dictionary attacks! Account lockouts, retry blockouts, captchas and even dynamic IP address filtering to stop dictionary attacks.

But let's think about that for a minute.

You want your password to be sufficiently complex such that it does not normally appear in an attacker's dictionary.

Password Complexity is created because of the traditional "dictionary" attacks.

Why do we have such a complex password policy? Let's think about it.